Nvidia unveils the full GeForce RTX 5070 and RTX 5070 Ti specifications

midian182

Posts: 10,396   +139
Staff member
What just happened? After all the anticipation over the arrival of Nvidia's RTX 5000 graphics cards, gamers have been disappointed by the lukewarm reviews of the RTX 5090 and 5080. But what about cards further down the product stack? Team Green has just released the full RTX 5070 and 5070 Ti specs, and it looks like Blackwell still isn't going to see much love from consumers.

Nvidia revealed the RTX 5070 / 5070 Ti at CES alongside the 5090 and 5080. The main specs were already known, but now the company has released an official document that dives further into the hardware.

Starting with the more powerful 5070 Ti, the card is based on the same GB203 GPU as the RTX 5080. It also has the same 16GB of GDDR7 VRAM with a memory bus width of 256-bit, but the memory speed is reduced from 30 Gbps to 28 Gbps.

The RTX 5070 Ti also has a TGP of 300W, 15W more than the RTX 4070 Ti. It will arrive with an MSRP of $549.

Graphics Card RTX 3070 Ti RTX 4070 Ti RTX 5070 Ti
GPU Codename GA104 AD104 GB203
GPU Architecture NVIDIA Ampere NVIDIA Ada Lovelace NVIDIA Blackwell
GPCs 6 5 6
TPCs 24 30 35
SMs 48 60 70
CUDA Cores / SM 128 128 128
CUDA Cores / GPU 6144 7680 8960
Tensor Cores / SM 4 (3rd Gen) 4 (4th Gen) 4 (5th Gen)
Tensor Cores / GPU 192 (3rd Gen) 240 (4th Gen) 280 (5th Gen)
RT Cores 48 (2nd Gen) 60 (3rd Gen) 70 (4th Gen)
GPU Boost Clock (MHz) 1770 2610 2452
Peak FP32 TFLOPS 21.7 40.1 43.9
RT TFLOPS 42.5 92.7 133.2
Frame Buffer Memory Size and Type 8 GB GDDR6X 12 GB GDDR6X 16 GB GDDR7
Memory Interface 256-bit 192-bit 256-bit
Memory Clock (Data Rate) 19 Gbps 21 Gbps 28 Gbps
Memory Bandwidth 608 GB/sec 504 GB/sec 896 GB/sec
ROPs 96 80 96
Pixel Fill-rate (Gigapixels/sec) 169.9 208.8 235.4
Texture Units 192 240 280
Texel Fill-rate (Gigatexels/sec) 339.84 626.4 686.6
L1 Data Cache/Shared Memory 6144 KB 7680 KB 8960 KB
L2 Cache Size 4096 KB 49152 KB 49152 KB
Register File Size 12288 KB 15360 KB 17920 KB
Video Engines 1 x NVENC (7th Gen), 1 x NVDEC (5th Gen) 2 x NVENC (8th Gen), 1 x NVDEC (5th Gen) 2 x NVENC (9th Gen), 1 x NVDEC (6th Gen)
TGP (Total Graphics Power) 290 W 285 W 300 W
Transistor Count 17.4 Billion 35.8 Billion 45.6 Billion
Die Size 392.5 mm² 294.5 mm² 378 mm²
Manufacturing Process Samsung 8 nm 8N TSMC 4nm 4N TSMC 4nm 4N
PCI Express Interface Gen 4 Gen 4 Gen 5

Nvidia has provided its typically vague performance comparison charts for the card, putting it up against the RTX 4070 Ti. Unsurprisingly, five of the six benchmarks are with DLSS enabled.

Moving onto the RTX 5070, it features the GB205 GPU, whereas previous-generation equivalents have used xx104 dies. It has 12GB of VRAM (192-bit), the same as the RTX 4070, though it is of the GDDR7 variety and clocked at a faster 28 Gbps. Memory bandwidth is up from 507 GB/s to 672 GB/s.

The 5070's TGP is 250W, 50W more than its predecessor and 30W more than the RTX 4070 Super. The MSRP has yet to be revealed. As a reminder, the $799 RTX 4070 Ti was $200 more than the $599 RTX 4070 at launch.

Graphics Card RTX 3070 RTX 4070 RTX 5070
GPU Codename GA104 AD104 GB205
GPU Architecture NVIDIA Ampere NVIDIA Ada Lovelace NVIDIA Blackwell
GPCs 6 5 5
TPCs 23 23 24
SMs 46 46 48
CUDA Cores / SM 128 128 128
CUDA Cores / GPU 5888 5888 6144
Tensor Cores / SM 4 (3rd Gen) 4 (4th Gen) 4 (5th Gen)
Tensor Cores / GPU 184 (3rd Gen) 184 (4th Gen) 192 (5th Gen)
RT Cores 46 (2nd Gen) 46 (3rd Gen) 48 (4th Gen)
GPU Boost Clock (MHz) 1725 2475 2512
Peak FP32 TFLOPS 20.3 29.1 30.9
RT TFLOPS 39.7 67.4 93.6
Frame Buffer Memory Size and Type 8 GB GDDR6 12 GB GDDR6X 12 GB GDDR7
Memory Interface 256-bit 192-bit 192-bit
Memory Clock (Data Rate) 14 Gbps 21 Gbps 28 Gbps
Memory Bandwidth 448 GB/sec 504 GB/sec 672 GB/sec
ROPs 96 64 80
Pixel Fill-rate (Gigapixels/sec) 165.6 158.4 201
Texture Units 184 184 192
Texel Fill-rate (Gigatexels/sec) 317.4 455.4 482.3
L1 Data Cache/Shared Memory 5888 KB 5888 KB 6144 KB
L2 Cache Size 4096 KB 36864 KB 49152 KB
Register File Size 11776 KB 11776 KB 12288 KB
Video Engines 1 x NVENC (7th Gen), 1 x NVDEC (5th Gen) 1 x NVENC (8th Gen), 1 x NVDEC (5th Gen) 1 x NVENC (9th Gen), 1 x NVDEC (6th Gen)
TGP (Total Graphics Power) 220 W 200 W 250 W
Transistor Count 17.4 Billion 31.1 Billion 35.8 Billion
Die Size 392.5 mm² 294.5 mm² 263 mm²
Manufacturing Process Samsung 8 nm 8N TSMC 4nm 4N TSMC 4nm 4N
PCI Express Interface Gen 4 Gen 4 Gen 5

Here is Nvidia's performance chart for the RTX 5070, putting it up against the RTX 4070.

While Nvidia hasn't revealed launch dates, the RTX 5070 Ti is rumored to release on February 20. There are no reports yet on when the RTX 5070 will arrive.

It's always worth waiting for reviews of cards before making a judgment, of course, but most reactions to the specs have not been positive, especially in light of the RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 reviews, which we scored 80 and 70, respectively.

A key question now is whether AMD, which is prioritizing more affordable mid-range cards in its Radeon RX 9000 series, can capitalize on consumer apathy toward Blackwell. The RX 9070 XT, RX 9070, RX 9060, and RX 9050 will start to go on sale this March.

Permalink to story:

 
Er yeah.. looks like this will be a complete waste of time for all involved.
Aside for 4x frame gen, the 50 series doesn't really offer anything. I wonder if we'll see x framegen run on the 40 series with hacked drivers. Not that I recommend running hacked drivers, but it's still interesting to see if these features are software or hardware level. If they are software level limits then I'd argue that these cards are literally a scam.
 
I don’t know why folks are surprised by the performance from 4x to 5x. This is the new normal for a next gen hardware refresh going forward. Why? Moore’s law strikes again, or lack of. With new process nodes becoming harder and more expensive this means you can really only work on efficiency gains in your IC and driver stack and other “fake” (software driven) improvements. (Dlss, fsr, frame gen). This can only get you so far.

It’s actually somewhat scary we might be living in a more artificially generated frame world and company’s are going to further advertise these gains as actual performance. I for one will never support this, raw raster is my only chief concern.
 
3070 to 4070 was like 20% improvement and also 20% price bump. From the node shrink + faster clocks and the better RAM.
Now on the same node and only better ram...maybe single digit performance jump.
I guess the same for the Ti models also.

Nvidia just have a chart with performance and money. Do not expect miracles.

And yeah AMD will follow like a good cartel/mafia member.
 
This is sad, but I'm left wondering how much better will the Super refresh be if I wait another year?

If they use 3GB chips to up the 3070 TI VRAM to 24GB does that make it unobtainium because of AI?

I sure hope AMD's card can at least pull prices down for these lackluster gains.
 
I hope AMD can get their power consumption reduced in their next line, that would make me consider one of their cards. They were always just too power hungry and electricity is stupid expensive where I live.
 
LOL @Nvidia comparing to the original models when the 4070 Super and 4070 Ti Super exist with comparable or BETTER specs than these new models.

I waited until late in the game because I had a feeling that 4070 Ti Super was coming and I knew that was the one. I got it and I've never been more satisfied with a graphics card. The ASUS ProArt version is an absolute beauty and at $800 I have no complaints.

They will likely need another generation of cards to dethrone it.
 
Last edited:
Nvidia is out here playing "How Much Can We Charge Before People Riot?" while AMD is quietly setting up a lemonade stand across the street.
 
The only real bump was the 5090. The 5080 and 5070 are such let downs. It's clear Nvidia went super cheap on the ram. 5080 should've had 24gb ddr7 memory and the 5070 should now be at 16gb for both versions.
The 5070ti will probably be the most "interesting card" as it will go up against the AMD 9070 - curious to see how they end up comparing in price and performance
 
Nvidia could have just kept on going with the 40 instead of releasing this fake new generation. They could have called the 5090 the 4090Ti or Titan and that's it. This is bonkers...
 
I don’t know why folks are surprised by the performance from 4x to 5x. This is the new normal for a next gen hardware refresh going forward. Why? Moore’s law strikes again, or lack of. With new process nodes becoming harder and more expensive this means you can really only work on efficiency gains in your IC and driver stack and other “fake” (software driven) improvements. (Dlss, fsr, frame gen). This can only get you so far.
You have been listening Jensen too much. Architecture improvements allow more performance but Nvidia has stuck on same basic GPU architecture for 10 years now. No wonder there is any improvement. In other words, Nvidia is just lazy so they fill fanboys with stupid propaganda.
 
Back